Saturday, April 11, 2009

Session 6:Online identity and interaction







An online identity is a social identity that an Internet user establishes in online communities and websites. Although some people prefer to use their real names online, most Internet users prefer to be anonymous, identifying themselves by means of pseudonyms, which reveal varying amounts of personally identifiable information.

The online identity used in our Ics691 class on http://www.blogger.com/ is mostly on the following major aspects: the user's posts, the user's personal profile, and the user's account. It includes some aspects include: the user's selected username (some use their real name, others make up a name). The online identities presented on www.bloger.com can be viewed as screenshot. There are many login accounts.

2) Write two informal use scenarios based on your observations of existing users.Scenario 1: We want to post what we read in our assignments.
The first step we need to login, or if we don't have an existing blogger, create one in http://www.blogger.com/create-blog.g The user will choose a blogger title. (Ics 691 social computing.), the blog address: http://yili-ics691socialcomputing.blogspot.com/ and the word verification: filling the word in the images. If it is accepted, you can choose a template for your blog. Of course, you can always edit the template. Then the system will generate a personnel profile according to what you entered. You can post whatever you want in your blog.

Scenario 2: We want to comment to other posts.
The first step we need to login. Then press the comment option. We will have a text editable window to write comments. Select a profile (I use Google account.) and press Post Comment. After entering the word verification, your comments are post successfully.

Online interaction brings the possibility of mass interaction. Steve Whittaker, Loren Terveen, Will Hill and Lynn Cherny explore the demographics, conversational strategies and the interactivity of mass interaction by Usenet. They extend the common ground model into online mass interactions. Common ground is a key principle of face-to-face conversation, and refers to the fact that participants must establish a degree of mutual knowledge for their conversational contributions to be understood. To establish a common ground in huge set of conversational participants with potentially diverse, a strategy of moderation is employed and all interactions are filtered by a small set of moderators who are knowledgeable about the goals and history of the interactions. The mass interactions are explored in three areas:
(a) demographics - size, familiarity and moderation;
(b) conversation strategies - FAQ production, message length, and cross-posting;
(c) interactivity - the extent of conversational threading.

Whittaker etc analysis the affects of demographics and conversation strategies on interactivities. They predict that FAQ production decreased cross-posting and greater message length should all increase interactivity. They try to test their predictions in Usenet. I am very impressed that most of their predictions are disconfirmed. They find that shorter messages actually promoted interactivity although they predict that great message length should increase interactivity. It surprised me very much that they can always find a reason to explain all of these disconfirmed predictions.

Judith Donath introduced the signal theory for online identity. personal identity is not just on what you enter in the profiles, which are perceivable features, but also on the actions that indicate the presence of hidden qualities. Signaling theory models the relationship between signals and qualities. He point out that assessment signals is inherently reliable, because producing the signal requires possessing the indicated quality. The conventional signals are not inherently reliable. The self-descriptions in online profiles are mostly conventional signals. The stronger ties bring reliability to the profile, and a large set of weaker ties expands the scale and scope of the network. To increase the trust and reliability, several methods have been used. One is to increase the amount of knowledge about the others. Also costs may discourage deception but not be high enough to guarantee honesty.
In our ics691 class, we know that all of us are students in university of Hawaii, Manoa. We form small groups and have high reliability. Each of us has different blog template. Some are very fashion and some may be a little plain. I believe that the one has longer post spends much more time than the one has short post.

3 comments:

  1. Very interesting that you decided to analyze blogger.com (particularly our classes interaction with it). Unfortunately, I think I know what online identity I'm putting forth (at least in the context of this course), and I don't think I'm particularly proud of/happy with it (but that's a whole other issue for me).

    I believe you overlooked a user's comments (thus interactivity) as being a major aspect of a student's ICS691 identity (or did you intend it as being part of the posts we make)? I think blogger has no capability to follow a user's (even your own) comments, so I guess basing an online persona on comments made would take a bit more work.

    Based on your assessment of blogger.com, do you think (or at least somewhat confident) the online identity each of us is displaying on blogger.com (at least in the context of this course) is representative of our real life persona? Does blogger.com make it easier or harder to hide/deceive/alter one's online persona?

    Hrm, I just noticed I can add ads to my blog to make money. I wonder how well that would go over... we do have a fairly captive audience (but I'm guessing I don't get too many hits). I'd better not, I would guess that would color my online identity with regards to this class somewhat negatively.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I never thought of analyzing identity in our class blogs. I assume this is a site you will be assessing further in your final project? That makes me a little nervous and self-conscious...although I wouldn't be surprised if Dr. Gazan does something similar (studying/analyzing our class' online behavior).

    I do think that the online identities that we present on blogger.com are fairly representative of our real life persona. It seems like a number of people in our online class know each other through other classes or real life encounters. This mixing of real life and online relationships brings a higher degree of 'reliability' to our online identities. I think it would take too much energy to pretend to be someone else and what would be the payoff?

    In regards to the Whitaker article, I agree that shorter messages can promote interactivity. Personally, I tend to gravitate towards more concise posts. There's a higher cost in terms of time to read and respond to lengthier messages. Thread depth can also influence interactivity. I get overwhelmed when there are a high number of responses in one thread and am less likely to post a comment. The possibility that I will have something unique to contribute lessens with each comment posted.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The length of the blog post doesn't seem to determine the number of comments generated for our course blogs. This at least true of this week's topic. It seems as though certain topics trigger more responses? Maybe users can relate to certain topics and generally have an opinion they'd wish to share. The readings attempt to analyze a cause and effect relationship between the number of responses for different types of posts. I wonder if users themselves craft posts to encourage responses as opposed to simply posting a thought or opinion with no intention of generating a conversation?

    ReplyDelete